Not every worn roof needs to be torn off. For a structurally sound roof, a coating restores waterproofing for 50 to 70 percent less than replacement. Here is an honest comparison to help you decide which path is right for your building.
A coating runs 50 to 70 percent less than a replacement. Replacement is a far larger capital expense.
Coatings go on with no tear-off, no dumpsters, and no shutdown. Replacement means debris, noise, and downtime.
If the deck and structure are sound and the roof is not saturated, a coating is usually the smarter, cheaper choice.
If the roof is saturated, structurally failing, or beyond restoration, replacement is the honest answer, and we will tell you.
For a structurally sound roof, a coating restores full waterproofing and adds 10 to 20 years of life, at a fraction of the cost. For a failing roof, replacement is the right call.
It comes down to the condition of the deck and whether the roof is saturated. We inspect first and give you an honest recommendation either way.
Yes. If a coating will not solve the problem, we say so. We do not push restorations on roofs that are truly done.
For a sound roof, coating and recoating over time is almost always cheaper than a full replacement, and far less disruptive.
Free, no-pressure roof inspection. If you truly need a replacement, we'll tell you.